Wednesday, May 21, 2014
Sunday, May 18, 2014
Friday, May 16, 2014
Quote De Jour
"It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion." - Joseph Goebbels
Thursday, May 15, 2014
Quote De Jour
"The last thing I ever wanted was to be alive when the
three most powerful people on the whole planet would be named Bush, Dick
and Colon." - Kurt Vonnegut
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
Quote De Jour
"Governments will use whatever technology is available to
them to combat their primary enemy - their own population." - Noam
Chomsky
Sunday, May 11, 2014
Quote De Jour
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not
who writes the laws." - Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), founder
of the House of Rothschild.
Saturday, May 10, 2014
DANG that Global Warming: Antarctic Sea Ice Approaching The Largest Ever Recorded
The area of excess Antarctic sea ice is almost large enough to cover the entire state of Alaska.
iphone.anomaly.antarctic.png (512×412)
iphone.anomaly.antarctic.png (512×412)
Cops continuously raid man's home looking for him; What part Of He Died In 2006 Don't They Understand
Fox News reports a story that just won’t stay dead. NYPD won’t stop raiding the former home of James Jordan Sr. Although Jordan died eight years ago; the cops still want to talk to him.
Jordan died in 2006 of diabetes, but cops have raided his former Brooklyn home more than a dozen times since his death. Jordan’s widow Karen told the NY Post that she has told the police several times that James is dead.
Frustrated relatives posted Jordan’s death certificate on the front door as a deterrent to keep cops away. Jordan’s final encounter with the law occurred in 1996. His widow said the police wanted him for turnstile jumping. She has since filed a lawsuit against the city in a Brooklyn federal court.
Jordan’s widow says cops have raided the Brooklyn home four times this year. The city’s Law Department didn’t respond to media inquiries. James Jordan Jr. said he only wants his father to rest in peace. Visit the New York Post for more details about this story.
Jordan died in 2006 of diabetes, but cops have raided his former Brooklyn home more than a dozen times since his death. Jordan’s widow Karen told the NY Post that she has told the police several times that James is dead.
Frustrated relatives posted Jordan’s death certificate on the front door as a deterrent to keep cops away. Jordan’s final encounter with the law occurred in 1996. His widow said the police wanted him for turnstile jumping. She has since filed a lawsuit against the city in a Brooklyn federal court.
Jordan’s widow says cops have raided the Brooklyn home four times this year. The city’s Law Department didn’t respond to media inquiries. James Jordan Jr. said he only wants his father to rest in peace. Visit the New York Post for more details about this story.
Thursday, May 8, 2014
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
New World Money Is HERE: IMF Loan to Ukraine in SDR, not US Dollars
This is the first that we know
of a loan by the IMF, headquartered in Washington, DC, as specifying a
loan in SDR (Special Drawing Rights) rather than in the customary US
Dollar. As with most policy changes from Washington, they ease changes
into existence, this seems to be the start in the use of SDR’s.
If this is the start in the use
of SDR’s, then in return it’s also the start in not using the US Dollar
for IMF loans, which are essentially US Govt loans.
The IMF Ukrainian loan press release is viewable here: www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2014/pr14189.htm
Friday, May 2, 2014
Anti-Obama Signs On I-5 Near Seattle Draw WH Threats
You want to see something better than Burma Shave signs? These are Northbound on I-5 (88 miles south of Seattle). The federal government is now petitioning to have these signs removed,
or Washington state will be denied additional monies for interstate
highways.
The State of Washington replied, they will secede from the Union rather
than be intimidated. These are a matter of free speech paid for by a
private citizen. It seems the Obama government uses intimidation and
ignores the First Amendment when they want to silence someone.
These signs are priceless.
Quote De Jour
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the
right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." -
David Rockefeller
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Cops No Longer Need Warrants to Search Vehicles
By Adan Salazar
Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court has ruled police officers in the Commonwealth are no longer required to obtain a warrant prior to searching a vehicle, a decision that essentially overturns the protections enumerated in the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and in Pennsylvania’s own state constitution.
Yesterday, Justice Seamus McCaffery issued the court’s opinion, stemming from a 2010 Philadelphia police department traffic stop of a man for having dark tinted windows, who was later found to be hiding two pounds of marijuana under the hood of his vehicle. In a 4-2 vote, the court decided “the prerequisite for a warrantless search of a motor vehicle is probable cause to search.”
Previously, as explained by Lancaster Online, police were not allowed to search a vehicle unless a driver consented, “or if the illegal substances were in plain view.”
“Now, based on the opinion, it only takes reasonable probable cause for an officer to go ahead with the search without a warrant,” writes Brett Hambright.
Not surprisingly, police are ecstatic.
“It is a ruling that helps law enforcement as they continue to find people in possession of illegal drugs,” said New Holland Police Lt. Jonathan Heisse, reports Hambright.
However, in her dissenting opinion, Justice Debra McCloskey Todd rightly noted the ruling “heedlessly contravenes over 225 years of unyielding protection against unreasonable search and seizure which our people have enjoyed as their birthright.” Todd also called the decision “diametrically contrary to the deep historical and legal traditions” of Pennsylvania, according to Associated Press.
Several defense attorneys also view the court’s ruling as a monumental government overreach that could negatively impact the normal, day-to-day lives of ordinary citizens.
“It’s an expanding encroachment of government power,” Jeffrey Conrad, a defense attorney with the law firm Clymer Musser & Conrad told Hambright today regarding the court’s final opinion. “It’s a protection we had two days ago, that we don’t have today. It’s disappointing from a citizens’ rights perspective.”
“I am concerned,” another defense attorney, Christopher Patterson, expressed to Hambright, “that we are on a slippery slope that will eliminate personal privacy and freedom in the name of expediency for law enforcement.”
Another lawyer clarified that the ruling does not grant police the authority to search vehicles arbitrarily.
“This does not mean that they may search every vehicle they stop,” Mike Winters with the law firm McMahon & Winters said. “They must still develop probable cause before they are permitted to search your vehicle without a warrant.”
Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court has ruled police officers in the Commonwealth are no longer required to obtain a warrant prior to searching a vehicle, a decision that essentially overturns the protections enumerated in the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and in Pennsylvania’s own state constitution.
Yesterday, Justice Seamus McCaffery issued the court’s opinion, stemming from a 2010 Philadelphia police department traffic stop of a man for having dark tinted windows, who was later found to be hiding two pounds of marijuana under the hood of his vehicle. In a 4-2 vote, the court decided “the prerequisite for a warrantless search of a motor vehicle is probable cause to search.”
Previously, as explained by Lancaster Online, police were not allowed to search a vehicle unless a driver consented, “or if the illegal substances were in plain view.”
“Now, based on the opinion, it only takes reasonable probable cause for an officer to go ahead with the search without a warrant,” writes Brett Hambright.
Not surprisingly, police are ecstatic.
“It is a ruling that helps law enforcement as they continue to find people in possession of illegal drugs,” said New Holland Police Lt. Jonathan Heisse, reports Hambright.
However, in her dissenting opinion, Justice Debra McCloskey Todd rightly noted the ruling “heedlessly contravenes over 225 years of unyielding protection against unreasonable search and seizure which our people have enjoyed as their birthright.” Todd also called the decision “diametrically contrary to the deep historical and legal traditions” of Pennsylvania, according to Associated Press.
Several defense attorneys also view the court’s ruling as a monumental government overreach that could negatively impact the normal, day-to-day lives of ordinary citizens.
“It’s an expanding encroachment of government power,” Jeffrey Conrad, a defense attorney with the law firm Clymer Musser & Conrad told Hambright today regarding the court’s final opinion. “It’s a protection we had two days ago, that we don’t have today. It’s disappointing from a citizens’ rights perspective.”
“I am concerned,” another defense attorney, Christopher Patterson, expressed to Hambright, “that we are on a slippery slope that will eliminate personal privacy and freedom in the name of expediency for law enforcement.”
Another lawyer clarified that the ruling does not grant police the authority to search vehicles arbitrarily.
“This does not mean that they may search every vehicle they stop,” Mike Winters with the law firm McMahon & Winters said. “They must still develop probable cause before they are permitted to search your vehicle without a warrant.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)