A study published in the European Heart Journal concludes that, though digitalis does help steady erratic heart beats, it does so at an enormous cost:
Our findings suggest that, in patients with AF, digoxin is associated with increased all-cause mortality after controlling for comorbidities and propensity scores, regardless of gender and the presence or absence of underlying HF. All-cause mortality was 41% higher in patients on digoxin.There is no hemming or hawing around in that conclusion. If you take digoxin, also known as digitalis, you are 41% more likely to die—and that includes the likelihood of dying from heart disease itself or any other cause.
If you relate to graphics better, simply look at the graph to the left. This shows the survival rates, in terms of Kaplan-Meier curves of the 4060 subjects in the study.
The data comes from the Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial. The 4060 subjects were followed an average (mean) of 3.5 years. They were seen for follow-ups at the first 2 and 4 month markers, and then every 4 months up to a maximum of 6 years.
Instead of focusing on deaths from heart disease, these authors looked at all-cause mortality. Obviously what matters is not simply whether the drug keeps you from dying of a particular cause, but how it affects your chances of dying from any cause. There’s no benefit in avoiding death from a heart attack if you’re more likely to die from other causes.
The study showed that in patients with atrial fibrillation, but no diagnosis of heart failure, digitalis was responsible for 37% more deaths.
The authors clearly stated that patients without congestive heart failure and low ejection fraction cannot gain any benefit whatsoever from digitalis. As they point out, this is not new information.
No comments:
Post a Comment