Coordinated Harassment and Neutralization of “Social Undesirables” Now Underway!

In 2008, F.B.I. whistleblower Ted Gunderson warned of a “tax-payer funded, genocidal purge” conducted by an “illegal, government-criminal enterprise” funded by “black budget” programs and powerful individuals.

These individuals, as now targeted mainstream journalist Vic Livingston reported, retained the ability to “red-line” innocent individuals by community-policing units designed to vilify and harass “terrorists” in a post-9-11 world.
However, as now blacklisted scientist Robin Webster reveals, many of these individuals are innocent and have been arbitrarily classified as “social undesirables” by vengeful or otherwise criminal yet influential entities…In addition, Webster, Livingston, Gunderson, and a host of others suggest  the ongoing use of America’s Radio-Frequency Directed Energy (R.F.D.E.) system to further isolate and “break the will” of often once successful individuals.
The R.F.D.E. System, a component of euphemistically termed “non-lethal weaponry,” can produce varied biological effects, including remotely delivered “shocks” (via maser-guided plasma from microwave plasma generators, one of the earlier ones being developed by Russel Targ of the Stanford Research Institute in the 1970s), the microwave auditory effect (this sensation of “hearing voices” was first induced by Allen Frey in the 1960s via radio wave stimulation of nervous systems), Radio Hypnotic Intracerebral Control (R.H.I.C.: a capability for precision-control of a human being first developed by the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) in the mid-20th century and analogized by C.I.A.-employed Dr. Jose Delgado’s infamous stopping of a raging, implanted bull via the push of a button), and various forms of E.E.G. Heterodyning or mixing (“mind-melding”) of human brain waves (this capability, exposed by U.S. Department of Defense Whistle-blower Robert Duncan and others, can induce powerful, strange emotional experiences and is attested to by Duke University’s recent [in February 2013] “mind-melding” of rats from different countries over the internet  via implanted electrodes that resulted in the rats initiating similar behaviors. Many, including Duncan and Gunderson, have claimed, as well, that these technological advances are being randomly tested on  innocent, unwitting, and non-political American citizens (see attorney/activist Cheryl Walsh’s June 2012 article in the Essex Review attached to this document).
Here, you may consider that our laws are simply too “conservative” to keep up with these covert scientific advances in psycho-tronics and terrifying scales of human depravity; yet, I urge you to consider U.N. and European resolutions calling for a ban on these “potential weapons of mass destruction,” U.S. Congressman Dennis Kucinich’s unsuccessful 2001 Space Preservation Act that called for a similar ban on “electromagnetic radiation” (EMR) weaponry, Michigan’s anti-EMR law against electronic harassment (distinctive of cyber-harassment and concerning the aforementioned biological effects) established in 2004, similar laws in Maine & Massachussetts, and Missouri State Representative Jim Guest’s letter (attached to this letter) to Congress demanding an investigation of these horrific crimes for which Nazi scientists and soldiers were hung at Nuremberg trials shortly after World War II.
Let’s not forget, of course, laws against nonconsensual implantation in the states of Nevada, Wisconsin, and California prompted in part by the success of James Walbert’s 2008 lawsuit against his business partner for nonconsensual implantation.