NANO CHEMTRAILS
by William Thomas
If you did not enjoy "traditional" chemtrails raining down on you, you
are not going to like the new version, which the United States Air Force
promises will feature aerial dumps of programmable "smart" molecules
tens of thousands of times smaller than the particles already landing
people in emergency rooms with respiratory, heart and gastrointestinal
complaints.
Under development since 1995, the military's goal is to
install microprocessors incorporating gigaflops computer capability into
"smart particles" the size of a single molecule.
Invisible except under the magnification of powerful
microscopes, these nano-size radio-controlled chips are now being made
out of mono-atomic gold particles. Networked together on the ground or
assembling in the air, thousands of sensors will link into a single
supercomputer no larger than a grain of sand.
Brought to you by the same military-corporate-banking
complex that runs America's permanent wars, Raytheon Corp is already
profiting from new weather warfare technologies. The world's fourth
largest military weapons maker bought E-Systems in 1995, just one year
after that military contractor bought APTI, holder of Bernard Eastlund's
HAARP patents.
Raytheon also owns General Dynamics, the world's leading manufacturer of military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.
Raytheon also reports the weather for NOAA through its
Advanced Weather Information Processing System. According to researcher
Brendan Bombaci of Durango, Colorado, these Raytheon computers are
directy linked with their UAV weather modification drones. Bombaci
reports that NOAA paid Raytheon more than $300 million for this
"currently active, 10-year project."
She goes on to describe the Joint Environmental Toolkit
used by the U.S. Air Force in its Weather Weapons System. Just the thing
for planet tinkerers.
GREEN LIGHT
For public consumption, nano-weather control jargon has
been sanitized. "Microelectric Mechanical Sensors" (MMS) and "Global
Environmental Mechanical Sensors" sound passively benign. But these
ultra-tiny autonomous aerial vehicles are neither M&Ms nor gems.
[Space.com Oct 31/05]
According to a U.S. military flier called Military
Progress, "The green light has been given" to disperse swarms of
wirelessly-networked nano-bots into the troposphere by
remotely-controlled UAV drones for "global warming mitigation."
U.S. Army Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, as well as
U.S. Air Force drones "are slated to deploy various payloads for weather
warfare," Military Progress asserts. This dual mission - to slow global
warming and use weather as a weapon - seems somewhat contradictory.
FIGHTING FOR CLIMATE CHANGE
U.S. Military Inc. is already in the climate change
business big time. The single biggest burner of petroleum on this
planet, its high-flying aircraft routinely rend Earth's protective
radiation shielding with nitrous oxide emissions, while depositing
megatons of additional carbon, sulfur and water particles directly into
the stratosphere - where they will do three-times more damage than CO2
alone.
Go figure. A single F-15 burns around 1,580 gallons an
hour. An Apache gunship gets about one-half mile to the gallon. The
1,838 Abrams tanks in Iraq achieve five gallons to the mile, while
firing dusty radioactive shells that will continue destroying human DNA
until our sun goes supernova.
A single non-nuclear carrier steaming in support burns
5,600 gallons of bunker fuel in an hour - or two million gallons of
bunker oil every 14 days. Every four days, each carrier at sea takes on
another half- million gallons of fuel to supply its jets.
The U.S. Air Force consumed nearly half of the
Department of Defense's entire fuel supply in 2006, burning 2.6 billion
gallons of jet fuel aloft.
While flying two to five-hour chemtrails missions to
reflect incoming sunlight and slow global warming, a single KC-10 tanker
will burn 2,050 gallons of highly toxic jet fuel every hour. The larger
and older KC-135 Stratotanker carries 31,275 gallons of chemtrails and
burns 2,650 gallons of fuel per hour.
The EPA says that each gallon of gasoline produces 19.4
pounds of CO2. Each gallon of diesel produces 22.2 pounds of CO2.
Total it up and routine operations by a military bigger
than all other world militaries combined puts more than 48 billion tons
of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year. Nearly half that total
could be eliminated by ending the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan.
[TomDispatch.com June 16/07; huffingtonpost.com Oct 29/07]
NANO RAIN
Meanwhile, the 60 year quest for weather warfare
continues. Though a drone cannot carry a heavy payload, more
sub-microscopic weather modification particles can be crammed into a UAV
Predator than all the chemtrail slurry packed into a tanker the size of
a DC-10. T
According to the air force's own weather modification study, Owning The Weather 2025,
clouds of these extremely teeny machines will be dropped into
hurricanes and other weather systems to blend with storms and report
real time weather data to each other and a larger sensor network.
Then these smart particles will be used to increase or
decrease the storm's size and intensity - and "steer" it to "specific
targets".
The air force report boasted that nano-chemtrails "will
be able to adjust their size to optimal dimensions for a given seeding
situation and make adjustments throughout the process." Instead of being
sprayed into the air at the mercy of the winds aloft, as is the fate of
normal chemtrails, nano versions will be able to "enhance their
dispersal" by "adjusting their atmospheric buoyancy" and "communicating
with each other" as they steer themselves in a single coordinated flock
within their own artificial cloud.
Nano-chemtrails will even "change their temperature and
polarity to improve their seeding effects," the air force noted. [Daily
Texan July 30/07]
Rutgers University scientist J. Storrs Hall held out the
military's hope that these new nano weather-warrior bots:
"Interconnected, atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation
capability in three dimensions - clouds of microscopic computer
particles communicating with each other and with a control system, could
provide tremendous capability."
Sounds expensive.
FULL ARTICLE CONTINUED...
No comments:
Post a Comment