Ontoplist

Online Marketing Toplist
Search Engine Optimization by OnTop SEO Company
Add blog to our blog directory.

Friday, November 21, 2014

15 Of The Best Quotes and Statements On Why Chemotherapy and Conventional Cancer Treatment Kills People

First some convincing facts from decades past on the corruption of conventional cancer treatment ("from Reclaiming Our Health: Exploding the Medical Myth and Embracing the Source of True Healing by John Robbins):
  • "Percentage of cancer patients whose lives are predictably saved by chemotherapy - 3%
  • Conclusive evidence (majority of cancers) that chemotherapy has any positive influence on survival or quality of life - none.
  • Percentage of oncologists who said if they had cancer they would not participate in chemotherapy trials due to its "ineffectiveness and its unacceptable toxicity" - 75%
  • Percentage of people with cancer in the U.S. who receive chemotherapy - 75%.
  • Company that accounts for nearly half of the chemotherapy sales in the world - Bristol-Meyers Squibb.
  • Chairman of the board of Bristol-Meyers - Richard L. Gelb.
  • Mr. Gelb's other job: vice chairman, board of overseers, board of managers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, World's largest private cancer treatment and research center.
  • Chairman, Memorial Sloan-Kettering's board of overseers, board of managers - John S. Reed.
  • Reed's other job - director, Philip Morris (tobacco company).
  • Director, Ivax, Inc., a prominent chemotherapy company - Samuel Broder.
  • Broder's other job (until 1995) - executive director, National Cancer Institute.

  • ADDITIONAL FACTS:
  • radiation-induced secondary cancers have exploded in the last two decades due to radiation treatment
  • 90% of chemotherapy patients die 10-15 years after treatment and the causes is never attributed to treatment
  • patients who undergo chemo are 14 times more likely to develop leukemia and 6 times more likely to develop cancer of the bones, joints, and soft tissues than those patients who do not undergo chemotherapy
  • chemotherapy drugs directly damage DNA
  • chemotherapy boosts cancer growth
  • 68% increase in chemo drugs since 2003
  • 75% increase in cancer projected by 2030
15 of the Most Notable Quotes and Statements on Conventional Cancer Treatment

1) "He said, "I'm giving cancer patients over here at this major cancer clinic drugs that are killing them, and I can't stop it because they say the protocol's what's important." And I say, "But the patient's not doing well." They say, "The protocol's what's important, not the patient." And he said, "You can't believe what goes on in the name of medicine and science in this country."
(Gary Null)

2) "According to medical associations, the notorious and dangerous side effects of drugs have become the fourth main cause of death after infarction, cancer, and apoplexy"
(Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998)

3) "97 percent of the time chemotherapy does not work. So why is it still used? There's one reason and one reason only...money."
(Peter Glidden, N.D)

4) "We have a multi-billion dollar industry that is killing people, right and left, just for financial gain. Their idea of research is to see whether two doses of this poison is better than three doses of that poison."
(Glen Warner, M.D. oncologist)

5) "My clinical experience is that in America, when people die from cancer, they are NOT actually dying from cancer, but instead, they are dying from the medical TREATMENT itself. They are dying from the chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. AGAIN: They are NOT dying from the cancer--they are being killed by the medical doctors and their medical treatment!"
(Richard Shulze, N.D., M.H.)

6)
"In the end there is no proof that chemotherapy in the vast majority of cases actually extends life." "The great success stories of chemotherapy were always in relatively obscure types of cancer. Childhood leukemia constitutes less than two percent of all cancers and many of chemotherapy's other successes were in diseases so rare that many clinicians had never even seen a single case (Burkitt's lymphoma, choriocarcinoma, etc.)"
(Dr Ralph Moss, Ph.D.)

7) "Many oncologists recommend chemotherapy for almost any type of cancer, with a faith that is unshaken by the almost constant failures".
(Albert Braverman, MD, "Medical Oncology in the 90s", Lancet, 1991, Vol. 337, p. 901)

8) Since the 1950s, evidence has steadily accumulated that surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are far less effective than the public is being led to believe. Investigative journalist Daniel Greenberg, writing in the Columbia Journalism Review in 1975, produced the first widely reported expose showing that cancer survival rates since the 1950s had not progressed, and that improvements from 1930 to 1950 were mainly a consequence of improved hospital nursing care and support systems. Greenberg found that even the valid improvements were very, very small, and that there had been no significant advancements in treating any of the major forms of cancer.
(When Healing Becomes a Crime --Kenny Ausubel, 2001)

9) "If you can shrink the tumour 50% or more for 28 days you have got the FDA's definition of an active drug. That is called a response rate, so you have a response..(but) when you look to see if there is any life prolongation from taking this treatment what you find is all kinds of hocus pocus and song and dance about the disease free survival, and this and that. In the end there is no proof that chemotherapy in the vast majority of cases actually extends life, and this is the GREAT LIE about chemotherapy, that somehow there is a correlation between shrinking a tumour and extending the life of the patient."
(Dr Ralph Moss, Ph.D)

10) "The majority of the cancer patients in this country die because of chemotherapy, which does not cure breast, colon or lung cancer. This has been documented for over a decade and nevertheless doctors still utilize chemotherapy to fight these tumors."
(Allen Levin, MD, UCSF, "The Healing of Cancer", Marcus Books, 1990).

11) "As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incromprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good."
(Alan Nixon, Ph.D., Past President, American Chemical Society)

12) "If I were to contract cancer, I would never turn to a certain standard for the therapy of this disease. Cancer patients who stay away
from these centers have some chance to make it."
(Prof. Gorge Mathe, "Scientific Medicine Stymied", Medicines Nouvelles, Paris, 1989)

13) "After all, and for the overwhelming majority of the cases, there is no proof whatsoever that chemotherapy prolongs survival expectations. And this is the great lie about this therapy, that there is a correlation between the reduction of cancer and the extension of the life of the patient".
(Philip Day, "Cancer: Why we're still dying to know the truth", Credence Publications, 2000)

14) "The majority of publications equate the effect of chemotherapy with (tumour) response, irrespective of survival. Many oncologists take it for granted that response to therapy prolongs survival, an opinion which is based on a fallacy and which is not supported by clinical studies. To date there is no clear evidence that the treated patients, as a whole, benefit from chemotherapy as to their quality of life."
(Dr. Ulrich Abel.1990)

15) "Doctor Ulrich Able, a German epidemiologist of the Heidelberg Mannheim Tumor Clinic, has exhaustively analyzed and reviewed all the main studies and clinical experiments ever performed on chemotherapy...Able discovered that the comprehensive world rate of positive outcomes because of chemotherapy was frightening, because, simply, nowhere was scientific evidence available demonstrating that chemotherapy is able to 'prolong in any appreciable way the life of patients affected by the most common type of organ cancer.' Able highlights that rarely can chemotherapy improve the quality of life, and he describes it as a scientific squalor while maintaining that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered in the world is worthless. Even if there is no scientific proof whatsoever that chemotherapy works, neither doctors nor patients are prepared to give it up."
(Lancet, Aug. 10, 1991).


-The Man Who Defied Odds, Turned Down Chemotherapy and Drugs and Outlived All His Doctors

- 97 Percent of The Time, Chemotherapy Does Not Work And Continues To Be Used Only For One Reason

- The Latest Lie From The Cancer Industry: 'Don't Worry About Chemotherapy During Pregnancy, It's Perfectly Safe'

Thursday, November 20, 2014

What would it be like if YOU were suddenly homeless?


mental Psychiatrists now say non-conformity is a mental illness: only the sheeple are 'sane'

Modern psychiatry has become a hotbed of corruption, particularly the kind that seeks to demonize and declare mentally ill anyone who deviates from what is regarded as the norm. This is abundantly evident in the latest installment of the industry's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM, which dubs people who do not conform to what those in charge declare to be normal as mentally insane.

The so-called "condition" for why a person might choose to resist conformity has been labeled by the psychiatric profession as "oppositional defiant disorder," or ODD. The new DSM defines this made-up disease as an "ongoing pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior," and also lumps it in alongside attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD, another made-up condition whose creator, Dr. Leon Eisenberg, admitted it to be phony on his death bed.

As you might suspect from this type of open-ended description, almost any personal behavior perceived by someone else to be undesirable or strange might be categorized as symptomatic of ODD. Children who throw temper tantrums or fight with their siblings, for instance, might be declared to have this supposed mental illness, as might children who express disagreement with their parents or teachers.

Disobedience and defiance are common behaviors among young children, and parents have long dealt with such behaviors by exercising proper discipline. At the same time, not all forms of disobedience and defiance are wrong, depending on the authority involved and the action petitioned. A child who is told by his teacher to keep his unpopular opinions to himself, for instance, and who resists this order might simply be exercising his freedom to express disagreement.

But that's the problem with categorizing conditions like ODD so loosely, as virtually any uncommon behavior can be declared to be oppositional or defiant simply because it bucks the status quo. Famous minds of the past like Thomas Edison and Alexander Graham Bell, for instance, whose unconventional ideas might have seemed crazy in their day, are the types of folks who today might be declared to have ODD or some other type of mental disease.

An even greater danger to using this subjective approach in the diagnosis of mental illness is that it threatens to curtail freedom of speech and political dissent. The federal government has already tried to declare those who oppose its tyrannical policies, or who simply question them, as having "political paranoia," a type of mental illness.


Characterizing non-conformity as 'mental illness' a hallmark of totalitarian government!

Such outlandish abuse of the medical system for controlling popular thought is nothing new. Many authoritarian governments, including the former USSR, implemented similar mental health programs that categorized dissenters as having chemical imbalances in need of a remedy. Today, that remedy is often mind-altering, psychotropic drugs with devastating side effects.

"Psychiatric incarceration of mentally healthy people is uniformly understood to be a particularly pernicious form of repression, because it uses the powerful modalities of medicine as tools of punishment, and it compounds a deep affront to human rights with deception and fraud," explains a 2002 analysis and commentary on the abuse of psychiatry in both the Soviet Union and China that was published in the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

"Doctors who allow themselves to be used in this way... betray the trust of society and breach their most basic ethical obligations as professionals."

You can view this study, which has powerful implications for what the psychiatric profession is becoming today, here:
http://jaapl.org.

Sources for this article include:

http://breakingdeception.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://rense.com

http://jaapl.org

http://science.naturalnews.com

Quote De Jour

"I am strongly in favor of using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes. The moral effect should be good...and it would spread a lively terror..." - Winston Churchill commenting on the British use of poison gas against the Iraqis after World War I