Take The Red Pill Now
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls The News
A trio of Obama scandals has forced the corporate
media admit its own reports are nothing more than the
government-controlled talking points and not the product of a free and
open press.
If you have been following the news
lately you’ll notice there are 3 government scandals that the media is
focusing on 1) The DOJ spying on the AP reporters 2) Benghazi gate 3)
IRS targeting of activist groups.
While each of these are truly a damning indictment of the widespread corruption in our now gone rogue federal government, combing these three stories reveals an even bigger story which is recurring open admission by the media that the news they report is being controlled government.

These three scandals have led the media to rebel against the Obama administration in a way that it has not done in the past while at the same time forcing the media to admit some damning facts about the way news is truly originated in America.
The media’s reporting on the scandals
has provided the public insights into the operations of the incestuous
relationship between the press and the government.
Such revelations clearly suggest the corporate media is telegraphing to the public the American government has just gone way too far out of control.
These three scandals forced the corporate media to admit openly what has long been dismissed as merely conspiracy theory — that the corporate
media is now openly admitting that they are in fact controlled
stenographers that do nothing more than echo pre-scripted narratives
outlined in talking points created by the rulers of America’s shadow
government.
To be absolutely clear, that is not hyperbole nor is it speculation. It’s a fact that the corporate
media is now openly admitting their reporting on the Benghazi scandal
over the last 8 months has been merely the parroting of statements given
by government officials who were merely echoing talking points issued
by the CIA.
By now just about every news
organization has repeatedly reported the story about how those CIA
issued talking points were edited 12 times by various people in the
shadow government before they were given to figureheads to relay to the
press who in turned echoed them to the masses.
This is a direct admission that the false narrative about Benghazi that has been shoved down our throat as fact by the corporate media was nothing more than CIA issued talking points.
Since subliminal manipulation the
consciousness of the masses is now a science that the government has
completely mastered, let make make sure you have been deprogrammed
before continuing.
Wake up – Every news outlet in the
country is admitting 8 months of news reports about Benghazi were
nothing more than the parroting of CIA issued talking points.
Stop.
Let it sink in.
This is not hyperbole and not sensationalism.
The entire corporate media is now openly
admitting what they presented to us as objective independent news
reports was nothing more than echoing of list CIA talking points.
Does that not at all disturb anyone?
Most people that are disturbed are merely disturbed by the fact the talking points were lies.
That is what the media is telling us the scandal is.
But the real scandal here, and the one
no one seems to have a problem with, is that the media is echoing an
actual list government talking points to the public and manipulating the
public into believing those talking points were the result of objective
independently verified investigative journalism.
Yes the real scandal is that the government is entirely controlling the news and the media is doing nothing more regurgitating an official narrative crafted by spooks in the shadow government.
Those spooks operate in secret and
disseminate their propaganda operation instructions to public figure
heads behind the scenes who in turn relay that information to the media
who then relays it to the public.
Information Operations, Google it.
But the media wants us to believe that
the scandal is that CIA’s talking points were lies and that’s the only
scandal the media wants you to see.
The media not dare look in the mirror and point onto itself.
Surely they represent themselves to the public as fact checkers who vet and verify all information in their reports.
But nothing can be further from the
truth because as we clearly see here even an amateur who made a measly
attempt to independently verify the statements issued by the government
would have easily outed the falsehoods in their claims.
Instead, the only scandal the media sees here is the fact the CIA’s talking points were deliberately falsified so Obama didn’t catch heat sothat he could be reelected.
Now look, I don’t disagree that is in
fact a scandal and the media by all rights should continue to
investigate and expose the truth about that scandal.
But for the well-being of this nation
and the protection of its citizen’s that media needs to be held just as
accountable because if they didn’t take the government at its word
despite a continual track record of lies and deception America would be a
much safer place today and the citizens of this nation and humanity as a
whole would have a much brighter, safer and secure future.
Instead the media’s incestuous
relationship with the government has lead to illegal overseas wars and
ongoing bombings in several nations that have claimed the lives of an
untold number of numerous people all being perpetuated by an
ever-expanding police state that looks more and more like an Orwellian
totalitarian nightmare with each day that passes.
Of course
the damage the media has allowed to occur will continue to reverberate
destructive echoes of carnage upon the masses for generations to come.
The IRS scandal illustrates this point
even further. The media has ignored for years complaints from activist
groups saying they were unfairly being shaken down by the IRS. Those
complaints were ignored even while members of congress of provided
evidence to back up the allegations. But what we saw was a corporate media controlled by the American Gestapo that dared not step off script and report
anything beside the talking points the government gave them. The same
goes with the destruction of the constitution through an escalating
campaign of post 9/11 hogwash from the Patriot Act, the NDAA, and drones
to draconian measure containing to be pushed by the propaganda machine
to implement measures such as CISPA, real-time total surveillance, and the inevitable disarming of the public.
The reason for this is clear but I fear if those in the media do not find the courage to be brave now it wil soon be too late.
News organizations know if they step out
of line they their access to their “inside sources” and be blacklisted
by the government. For individuals
in those organization committing such acts of bravery are career ending
moves. When the media steps out of line and reports anything that
contradicts official government narrative we see them get targeted by
the government, both covertly and overtly. We saw it with the coalition
of journalist that sued the government for being targeted through the
NDAA and with WikiLeaks.
This of course ties into the third scandal which is the Associated Press being spied on by the Gestapo for daring to report information that wasn’t explicitly authorized in talking points issued by the shadow government.
Yes, every now and then we see outlets such as the Associated Press,
The New York Times, or the Washington Post do so-called investigative
journalism that adds we are supposed to believe steps outside the
boundaries and conflicts with the official narrative. But don’t be
fooled. Yes the media reports them as “leaks” coming from “inside
sources speaking on the condition
of anonymity” but nothing could be further from the truth. Those
reports are nothing more than statements given by officials from the
same Gestapo who are quoted on the condition of anonymity and those leaks are authorized.
Just look at what is happening to the Associated Press right now.
They dared contradict the talking points narrative. Instead they
implicated the CIA as being involved in planning a Yemen based terror
plot which Al Qaeda operatives were going to attack American airplanes
and now they are being targeted by the Gestapo for leaking that
information.
Look at the reporting on Benghazi. I did
several investigative reports which debunked the government’s narrative
soon after the attacks. Many of the details I uncovered in my reporting
still to this day are not being discussed by the corporate media so
even the reports we are now being given by corporate media about the
scandal are still being controlled by talking points or we would hearing
much different information about the scandal from the media.
Of course this is typical of a media
that simply echoes government talking points. Just look at the reporting
on drone strikes, which in every case echoes government statements that
militants were killed despite hundreds of foreign news reports on the
bombings showing drone bombings repeatedly kill innocent woman and
children. The examples are numerous. Iraq’s WMDs, Libya, the BP oil
spill, Fukushima and even now we see the same thing in Syria.
Despite the corporate media’s track
record, be it unwittingly or knowingly or some combination thereof for
various reasons, of acting as an obedient mouthpiece in the propaganda
machine this all appears to be changing in the wake of the latest
scandals rocking the Obama administration.
This is all evidenced by the fact the
media is admitting its reporting is based on government generated
talking points which as stated before was never before admitted or
discussed openly beyond what has long been labeled the fringe conspiracy theorist crowd.
What is being signaled by this
revelation to the public is the government has gone far too rogue and we
ought to be wary that what we once accepted as credible news is nothing
more than a well-orchestrated campaign of propaganda.
Yet even in the wake of the media’s
rebellion we should not get to overzealous as government handlers will
soon work to stamp out those who are working to resist the machine.
Mass media news organizations will be forced in one way or another to get their reporting back on script.
For those in the media who read this,
the time to act is now. We cannot continue to allow the information that
is communicated to the masses by the media, which is the public’s tool
to keep the government in check and prevent it from becoming overbearing
on the people, to be controlled by a few rich and powerful figureheads
working as icy manipulators of a well oiled propaganda machine that for a
secret shadow government.
Saturday, May 18, 2013
INVENTOR OF ADHD'S DEATHBED CONFESSION: "ADHD IS A FICTITIOUS DISEASE"
Fortunately,
the Swiss National Advisory Commission on Biomedical Ethics (NEK,
President: Otfried Höffe) critically commented on the use of the ADHD
drug Ritalin in its opinion of 22 November 2011 titled Human enhancement
by means of pharmacological agents: The consumption of pharmacological
agents altered the child’s behavior without any contribution on his or
her part.
That amounted to interference in the child’s freedom and personal rights, because pharmacological agents induced behavioral changes but failed to educate the child on how to achieve these behavioral changes independently. The child was thus deprived of an essential learning experience to act autonomously and emphatically which “considerably curtails children’s freedom and impairs their personality development”, the NEK criticized.
The alarmed critics of the Ritalin disaster are now getting support from an entirely different side. The German weekly Der Spiegel quoted in its cover story on 2 February 2012 the US American psychiatrist Leon Eisenberg, born in 1922 as the son of Russian Jewish immigrants, who was the “scientific father of ADHD” and who said at the age of 87, seven months before his death in his last interview: “ADHD is a prime example of a fictitious disease”
Since 1968, however, some 40 years, Leon Eisenberg’s “disease” haunted the diagnostic and statistical manuals, first as “hyperkinetic reaction of childhood”, now called “ADHD”. The use of ADHD medications in Germany rose in only eighteen years from 34 kg (in 1993) to a record of no less than 1760 kg (in 2011) – which is a 51-fold increase in sales! In the United States every tenth boy among ten year-olds already swallows an ADHD medication on a daily basis. With an increasing tendency.
When it comes to the proven repertoire of Edward Bernays, the father of propaganda, to sell the First World War to his people with the help of his uncle’s psychoanalysis and to distort science and the faith in science to increase profits of the industry – what about investigating on whose behalf the “scientific father of ADHD” conducted science? His career was remarkably steep, and his “fictitious disease” led to the best sales increases. And after all, he served in the “Committee for DSM V and ICD XII, American Psychiatric Association” from 2006 to 2009. After all, Leon Eisenberg received “the Ruane Prize for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Research. He has been a leader in child psychiatry for more than 40 years through his work in pharmacological trials, research, teaching, and social policy and for his theories of autism and social medicine”.
And
after all, Eisenberg was a member of the “Organizing Committee for
Women and Medicine Conference, Bahamas, November 29 – December 3, 2006,
Josiah Macy Foundation (2006)”. The Josiah Macy Foundation organized
conferences with intelligence agents of the OSS, later CIA, such as
Gregory Bateson and Heinz von Foerster during and long after World War
II. Have such groups marketed the diagnosis of ADHD in the service of
the pharmaceutical market and tailor-made for him with a lot of
propaganda and public relations? It is this issue that the American
psychologist Lisa Cosgrove and others investigated in their study
Financial Ties between DSM-IV Panel Members and the Pharmaceutical
Industry7. They found that “Of the 170 DSM panel members 95 (56%) had
one or more financial associations with companies in the pharmaceutical
industry. One hundred percent of the members of the panels on ‘Mood
Disorders’ and ‘Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders’ had
financial ties to drug companies. The connections are especially strong
in those diagnostic areas where drugs are the first line of treatment
for mental disorders.” In the next edition of the manual, the situation
is unchanged. “Of the 137 DSM-V panel members who have posted disclosure
statements, 56% have reported industry ties – no improvement over the
percent of DSM-IV members.” “The very vocabulary of psychiatry is now
defined at all levels by the pharmaceutical industry,” said Dr Irwin
Savodnik, an assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at the
University of California at Los Angeles.
This
is well paid. Just one example: The Assistant Director of the Pediatric
Psychopharmacology Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital and Associate
Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School received “$1 million
in earnings from drug companies between 2000 and 2007”. In any case, no
one can easily get around the testimony of the father of ADHD: “ADHD is a
prime example of a fictitious disease.”
The task of psychologists, educators and doctors is not to put children on the “chemical lead” because the entire society cannot handle the products of its misguided theories of man and raising children, and instead hands over our children to the free pharmaceutical market. Let us return to the basic matter of personal psychology and education: The child is to acquire personal responsibility and emphatic behavior under expert guidance – and that takes the family and the school: In these fields, the child should be able to lead off mentally. This constitutes the core of the human person.
That amounted to interference in the child’s freedom and personal rights, because pharmacological agents induced behavioral changes but failed to educate the child on how to achieve these behavioral changes independently. The child was thus deprived of an essential learning experience to act autonomously and emphatically which “considerably curtails children’s freedom and impairs their personality development”, the NEK criticized.
The alarmed critics of the Ritalin disaster are now getting support from an entirely different side. The German weekly Der Spiegel quoted in its cover story on 2 February 2012 the US American psychiatrist Leon Eisenberg, born in 1922 as the son of Russian Jewish immigrants, who was the “scientific father of ADHD” and who said at the age of 87, seven months before his death in his last interview: “ADHD is a prime example of a fictitious disease”
Since 1968, however, some 40 years, Leon Eisenberg’s “disease” haunted the diagnostic and statistical manuals, first as “hyperkinetic reaction of childhood”, now called “ADHD”. The use of ADHD medications in Germany rose in only eighteen years from 34 kg (in 1993) to a record of no less than 1760 kg (in 2011) – which is a 51-fold increase in sales! In the United States every tenth boy among ten year-olds already swallows an ADHD medication on a daily basis. With an increasing tendency.
When it comes to the proven repertoire of Edward Bernays, the father of propaganda, to sell the First World War to his people with the help of his uncle’s psychoanalysis and to distort science and the faith in science to increase profits of the industry – what about investigating on whose behalf the “scientific father of ADHD” conducted science? His career was remarkably steep, and his “fictitious disease” led to the best sales increases. And after all, he served in the “Committee for DSM V and ICD XII, American Psychiatric Association” from 2006 to 2009. After all, Leon Eisenberg received “the Ruane Prize for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Research. He has been a leader in child psychiatry for more than 40 years through his work in pharmacological trials, research, teaching, and social policy and for his theories of autism and social medicine”.
And
after all, Eisenberg was a member of the “Organizing Committee for
Women and Medicine Conference, Bahamas, November 29 – December 3, 2006,
Josiah Macy Foundation (2006)”. The Josiah Macy Foundation organized
conferences with intelligence agents of the OSS, later CIA, such as
Gregory Bateson and Heinz von Foerster during and long after World War
II. Have such groups marketed the diagnosis of ADHD in the service of
the pharmaceutical market and tailor-made for him with a lot of
propaganda and public relations? It is this issue that the American
psychologist Lisa Cosgrove and others investigated in their study
Financial Ties between DSM-IV Panel Members and the Pharmaceutical
Industry7. They found that “Of the 170 DSM panel members 95 (56%) had
one or more financial associations with companies in the pharmaceutical
industry. One hundred percent of the members of the panels on ‘Mood
Disorders’ and ‘Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders’ had
financial ties to drug companies. The connections are especially strong
in those diagnostic areas where drugs are the first line of treatment
for mental disorders.” In the next edition of the manual, the situation
is unchanged. “Of the 137 DSM-V panel members who have posted disclosure
statements, 56% have reported industry ties – no improvement over the
percent of DSM-IV members.” “The very vocabulary of psychiatry is now
defined at all levels by the pharmaceutical industry,” said Dr Irwin
Savodnik, an assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at the
University of California at Los Angeles.
This
is well paid. Just one example: The Assistant Director of the Pediatric
Psychopharmacology Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital and Associate
Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School received “$1 million
in earnings from drug companies between 2000 and 2007”. In any case, no
one can easily get around the testimony of the father of ADHD: “ADHD is a
prime example of a fictitious disease.”The task of psychologists, educators and doctors is not to put children on the “chemical lead” because the entire society cannot handle the products of its misguided theories of man and raising children, and instead hands over our children to the free pharmaceutical market. Let us return to the basic matter of personal psychology and education: The child is to acquire personal responsibility and emphatic behavior under expert guidance – and that takes the family and the school: In these fields, the child should be able to lead off mentally. This constitutes the core of the human person.
US Suspends Constitution in Permanent World War on Terror
![]() |
First, the senate is debating an expansion of the already broad powers of the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) so the U.S. can essentially engage any area in the world in the war on terror, including America. Which brings us to the second development: the Pentagon has recently granted itself police powers on American soil.
Assistant Secretary of Defense Michael Sheehan told Congress yesterday that the AUMF authorized the US military to operate on a worldwide battlefield from Boston to Pakistan. Sheehan emphasized that the Administration is authorized to put boots on the ground wherever the enemy chooses to base themselves, essentially ignoring the declaration of war clause in the US Constitution.
Senator Angus King said this interpretation of the AUMF is a "nullity" to the Constitution because it ignores Congress' role to declare war. King called it the "most astoundingly disturbing hearing" he's been to in the Senate.
Quote De Jour
"Christians are like frogs holding a symposium round a
swamp, debating which of them is most sinful." - Celsus on Christians
in the second century A.D.
Friday, May 17, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




